User talk:Ferhat Sharaf

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Traf-O-Data have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Traf-O-Data was changed by Ferhat Sharaf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966809 on 2023-03-18T16:53:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Playhouse Disney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. In both this article and at Traf-O-Data, you have given no explanation for why they should be redirects rather than separate articles. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Traf-O-Data, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Traf-O-Data. Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pepsi Wild Cherry, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 17:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CATDEF

Please read WP:CATDEF. Stop adding the category for android operating system inappropriately to articles. Schazjmd (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add clearly inappropriate categories, not supported by references in the article, to articles you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 00:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Nt

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Template:Nt has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Primefac (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disannexation, you may be blocked from editing. I wanted this to be a final warning or only warning, but could not find a template for the edits you have been making to redirects today. Or I could have just blocked you for a day, but preferred to give a warning instead. Jay 💬 14:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove redirect for discussion templates from pages until the discussion is closed. Schazjmd (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You must not remove redirect for discussion templates until the discussion is ended. Schazjmd (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Safe house raids

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Safe house raids requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 1#Safe house raids. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 15:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

i will never do that again. Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ferhat Sharaf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never do that Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing as unresponsive. You may make a new request when you are able to engage with us. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is it you will never do again? We need you to demonstrate your knowledge of this matter, as if you don't know what you shouldn't do again, you likely will do it again. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

i will never do Disruptive editing again i will fix misspeling Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ferhat Sharaf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i need to edit Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

And we need you to not edit until you are responsive to the requests on this page. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

UTRS appeal #84458 has been closed, with an instruction to post any future unblock request here. I also advise you that no administrator is likely to unblock you unless you make it clear that you understand why the block was imposed. The problem with unblock requests which just say general things to the effect of "I promise I won't do it again", without saying exactly what one won't do again, is that experience shows that most often in such cases the blocked editor actually doesn't understand the reasons for the block, and does do the same again. JBW (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Am blocked

I am blocked because i accidentally damaged wikipedia because i did disruptive editing and unblocked me i only did it once Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 13:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"HYUNDAI" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect HYUNDAI has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 24 § HYUNDAI until a consensus is reached. Is la🏳️‍⚧ 02:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ferhat Sharaf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for disruptive editing, but I am ready to take action to fix the situation. I assure you that I will correct any misspellings and ensure that my contributions are always constructive. I am confident that I can make a valuable contribution to this community, and I request that I be unblocked so that I can get back to doing what I do best. Thank you for your consideration.Ferhat Sharaf (talk) 04:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please speak specifically to the stated reason for the block, that you interfered with RFD processes. 331dot (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. 331dot (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]